Archive for the 'Articles' Category

D.C. Circuit Invalidates SEC’s Proxy Access Rules

Saturday, July 23rd, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

Earlier today, in Business Roundtable v. Securities & Exchange Commission, No. 10-1305 (D.C. Cir. July 22, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision invalidating the SEC’s proxy access rules adopted in August 2010 with the intention that they be effective for the 2011 proxy season (see [...]

Second Circuit Holds That the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Bars All RICO Claims Based Upon Alleged Acts of Securities Fraud

Thursday, July 21st, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In MLSMK Investment Co. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 10-3040-cv, 2011 WL 2640579 (2d Cir. July 7, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of claims brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 and 1964, seeking to hold defendants liable [...]

New York High Court Applies the “Single-Entity Exemption” in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In RGH Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 2011 WL 2471542 (N.Y. June 23, 2011), the New York Court of Appeals held that a liquidating trust established pursuant to a bankruptcy reorganization plan was a single “person” within the meaning of the “single-entity exemption” in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”). SLUSA [...]

Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Insider Trading Claims Alleging Misuse of Confidential Corporate Information Need Not Show Injury To the Corporation

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Kahn et al v. Kolberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P., No. 1808, 2011 WL 2447690 (Del. June 20, 2011), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by minority shareholders against corporate officers and a controlling shareholder. The Supreme Court held that plaintiffs could state a claim seeking [...]

Does Your Sarbanes-Oxley Act Compliance Program Reflect Your Social Media Presence?

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

A sound social media governance program means more than having a social media policy, or updating your document retention policy to include social media activity. It may also mean updating your Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) compliance program to ensure that your company is complying with Section 409. Section 409 of SOX requires companies to disclose material [...]

United States Supreme Court Holds that the “Maker” of a Statement for Rule 10b-5 Purposes is the Person or Entity with Ultimate Authority Over the Statement

Monday, June 20th, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, No. 09-525, 2011 WL 2297762 (U.S. Jun. 13, 2011) (Thomas, J.), the United States Supreme Court held that purposes of a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 , 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated [...]

United States Supreme Court Holds that Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Need Not Establish Loss Causation to Certify a Class

Tuesday, June 14th, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.,No. 09-1403, 2011 WL 2175208 (U.S. June 8, 2011), the United States Supreme Court held that securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove loss causation in order to invoke the presumption of investor reliance at the class certification stage. The Court’s unanimous ruling, which reversed the United States Court [...]

Delaware Chancery Court Considers Scope of Section 220 Books and Records Demand Made Where Sole Purpose Is to Investigate a Potential Derivative Suit

Monday, June 13th, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Graulich v. Dell, Inc., 2011 WL 1843813 (Del. Ch. May 16, 2011), the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected a stockholder’s demand under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“Section 220”). Section 220 provides that a stockholder in a Delaware corporation may, under certain conditions, request that that corporation make available certain books and [...]

Delaware Chancery Court Considers Whether a Reverse Triangular Merger Constitutes an Assignment by Operation of Law

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, C.A. No. 5589-VCP (Del. Ch. Apr. 8, 2011), the Delaware Court of Chancery denied a motion to dismiss a breach of contract claim, holding that a reverse triangular merger may constitute an assignment by operation of law. In the first Delaware case to address this issue, the Court [...]

California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a “Covered Class Action” and Involves a “Covered Security” Under SLUSA

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 No Commented
Under: Articles

In Luther v. Countrywide Financial Corp., No. B222889, 2011 WL 1879242 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. May 18, 2011), the California Court of Appeal for the Second District reversed the dismissal of a class action asserting a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77k. The trial court had sustained [...]

Page 5 of 21« First...«34567»...Last »

Powered by WordPress